April 2, 2009

Comparing Terms of Service at video sites

Target group: Cause organizations, nonprofits, NGOs, educators, students, businesses, general public

Drop down to see:
YouTube   Blip.tv   Ourmedia   Internet Archive   Yahoo Video   Revver   Google Video   Metacafe   DoGooder TV

JD LasicaMany organizations and users don’t give a second thought to the rights you forfeit over the use of your content when you post a video to a site like YouTube. Here’s a site-by-site breakdown of what you get — and give up — by consenting to the Terms of Service at some of the major video sites.

YouTube

YouTube’s TOS.

  • Ownership/licensing: You own your work but grant YouTube wide rights to reuse it.
  • Creative Commons licenses?: Not yet permitted. (Creative Commons explained.)
  • Payment to producers?: No.
  • Can you remove your work?: Yes.
  • Can they sell or license your video?: Yes.
  • Can they put ads on or around your video?: Yes.
  • Share your data with third parties?: No, though users may need to opt out.
  • Unsolicited emails?: No, though users may need to opt out.
  • Bottom line: YouTube is the 800-lb. gorilla of video hosting sites. Most people are there to gain visibility rather than income for their works; it remains to be seen how they’ll react if their work is sold to a third party without compensation to them.

Continue reading